
“Doubt is uncomfortable, certainty is ridiculous.” Voltaire
Growing up, I was taught that doubt was something to be avoided, weeded out, and guarded against; and that certainty was a virtue. Now I’m not so sure, but then I never really was.
In school, the teachers often taught us to look for, memorize, and repeat back the right answers. A good student knew his or her stuff and wasted little time with frivolous pursuits of other possibilities.
In church, the clergy taught us about the one, true way. A good person learned the faith, followed the teachings, and seldom bothered asking prickly, little questions.
And just about everywhere else I went, someone tried to convince me that things were either black or white. People with good sense got on board and shunned all silly shades of grey.
But I was never that certain about anything, and counted it a burden.
I marveled at and envied people with strong convictions. I didn’t know if they were right or wrong, but I thought their lives must be easier to navigate without so much deliberation.
I, in contrast, am one, big, walking heap of deliberation, equivocation, and doubt. The truth of the matter is that certainty scares the hell out of me.
I recently watched Fall from Grace, the documentary about the Westboro Baptist Church. Its members, primarily made up of the Phelps family, are notorious for the pickets they stage at the funerals of homosexuals and fallen soldiers.
In full view of grieving families, these men, women, and children assemble and hold up signs that say things like, “God hates fags,” and “Thank God for dead soldiers,” and “God hates your tears.”
As I watched the film, the thing that stunned me most was their absolute certainty. These are people who spend very little time deliberating. I imagined them sitting around the dinner table, the only topic of discussion or debate being whether to paint the word “fag” in metallic green or neon blue.
I’m amazed that anyone can get through life with so few questions.
The easy response to all of this would be to say, “Well, that’s Christians for ya,” but that’s just another form of certainty.
It’s easy to gather people into groups, sew on some labels, assign some traits, and be done with it, but there’s a problem with that approach: people are messy. They’re nuanced and diverse and they’re never quite what they seem to be at first glance.
Your hero can let you down, and that person you think you know, the one you’re convinced is a no-good, dirty dog, might be the first person to drop everything to save your life should the circumstances warrant it.
I guess that’s why I got myself into a little hot water yesterday when I took issue with a blog post about Christians. The author thinks I misread it, but I reread it a few times and still thought it was unfair. Yet being me, I’m not sure, and in her defense, it’s really none of my damned business.
I haven’t lived her life or endured her trials. Maybe I didn’t get her gist. Maybe I was being, as she claimed, passive aggressive. I’ve been known to be that from time to time.
Maybe I am, as she called me, a mild mad man. I certainly feel that way now and then.
I only know what I think, and what I think is this. Love, when you can find the strength to summon it, is better than hate.
I also think that hate feeds on certainty, that love is nourished by curiosity, and that curiosity is somehow tied to a healthy dose of doubt. For some reason, it’s hard to be curious about someone and hate them at the same time.
I screw up and forget this a great deal more than I wish to admit.
I guess the author of that post, and I, and all of you are all trying to do the best we can. Sometimes we get it right. Sometimes we get it wrong. And, unless we’ve stopped asking questions, we’re never exactly sure which one it is.
Are you getting all the Quiet Inspiration you need? Subscribe to Quiet Inspiration, the Mildly Creative Newsletter. You can also subscribe to these blog posts via RSS feed or by Email.





{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }
never stop doubting, never stop questioning, never stand idly by convictions…thanks.
Sandy
The diffculty of trying to have conversation in a medium like a blog comment is that it is difficult to get past the assumptions that are made about the person leaving the comment-obviously the defensiveness was there waiting for any response counter to the rant placed on the page-which CAUSES NO ROOM for real dialogue unfortunately
I played my role in the tiff. In hind sight, my initial comment was kind of snarky. I could have worded it differently. It came off as an attack on her personally.
Hi Ken,
Maybe it’s because i would have reacted the same way as you that i feel your pain. I just tend to retract in the face of such overt aggressiveness as the author then proceeded to show you. But it seems like, in the same way, she had an adverse reaction to you somewhat back-tracking and apologizing.
Conclusion is, i guess, one can only just be ourselves and be honest about how we feel and respect the other for not feeling the same way. At least you both did that. It’s good that you wrote about it, therapeutic in some way?
Me personally, it would have left me with that nagging little feeling in the pit of my stomach that would bother me all day. But then again, that’s just my issue cuz i feel uneasy about conflict, don’t like feeling i’ve upset someone and that someone now thinks less of me (again, me being that self-centered person who thinks the world revolves around her and who forgets that someone being upset is about that someone, not about me).
*end of rant* My point: thanks for being honest.
.-= CosmoChick´s last blog ..Are you creative? Do you have a creative outlet? =-.
I know that nagging little feeling well. I think it’s called being human.
Hi Ken, I’m a new reader and have very much enjoyed your blog these last few weeks. I just wanted to pop in here and sympathize that it is too easy to get caught up in a whirlwind of someone else’s nastiness on the internet. Like I think you did, I usually only find myself there because I wanted to come to someone else’s defense. Your post may have been a little “snarky” as you said, but if so, it’s the equivalent of a little cut while she went for total dismemberment. Talk about a disproportional response!
Moving away from her problem (and it’s comforting to remember that when someone takes issue with you disagreeing with them, it is very much their problem and not yours), I offer a big round of applause for healthy doses of uncertainty! It is the root of reason.
My friend Cath Duncan likes to talk about how there are three kinds of business: my business, other people’s business, and God’s (or the Universe’s) business. I stuck my nose in someone else’s business and got it slapped.
Wow, Ken. You smashed into napalm-spewing (the blogger's own phrase about herself) hatred, based on closed-minded certainty, and chose to be open and curious about it. I am seriously impressed. That would be hard as hell for me to do, but as you show it's so much better.
Hate feeds on certainty (love that)
Love is nourished by curiosity (Amen!)
Curiosity is [open to and all about] doubts
Curiosity means we know we're not done; there's so much more to explore and try out and learn about. Very cool.
And in this realization you move from self-doubting to more centered and knowing — not to certainty, but to alignment with your true self.
I'll take that over certainty any day.
“Curiosity means we know we’re not done.” I like that, Steve.
“Curiosity means we know we’re not done.” I like that, Steve.
http://dtwrkvcpo.edfixershop.com
–
Here’s to your journey,
Ken Robert
http://www.mildlycreative.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cape-Girardeau-MO/Mildly-Creative/150465213064
http://twitter.com/mildlycreative
I just got back from her blog, and left a comment. she seems to me to be a person heavily conflicted, now, and any disagreement will to her seem to be a personal attack. Your comment was not at all out of line, although perhaps too brief.
I have, BTW met and spoken with the people (who are mostly of one family — the Phelp’s) of the Westboro ‘church’ and find them to be even more odious than popular accounts would indicate. It was on the occasion of the funeral of Mathew Shepard and they were every bit as disgusting as you might think.
Walter Hawn
Hi, Walter.
I can’t imagine. The creepiest thing about that family is how they brainwash even the smallest of their children to spew the same hatred with the same degree of certainty.
Watching the film, I felt both happy and sad for the family members who got away. I’m glad they found a way to think for themselves and get out of there, but it must be difficult to watch your parents and siblings behave that way, even from afar.
I don’t know, Ken. I just read Mari’s article and came away with a different take. I thought her commentary was about the religion itself and how it’s structured in a manner that invites judgment and encourages proselytizing. Certainly, there are passages in the bible that support the type of hate that Westboro Baptist County Church is spewing.
I just didn’t take her post as a rant against Christians as individual people, but rather at some of the problems within religion itself and those who use it to propagate hate, anger, negativity, etc.
Here’s the thing: it doesn’t matter which religion you belong to. Most religions are subject to a vast realm of interpretive possibilities. I find that most people project. That is to say, their god and their religion is a reflection of their own attitudes, thoughts, and feelings. A hateful person usually worships a hateful god. A loving person embraces a loving god. And then there’s everything in between.
.-= Melissa Donovan´s last blog ..“What if?” Journal Prompts =-.
I think your last three sentences sum it all up.
You can’t really judge a person by the name of their religion or their lack of one, because they can fall anywhere on the spectrum you described.
Loving people use their faith to be more loving and hateful people use theirs for other means. But strip away the faith, and people still find reasons to love or hate. The religious don’t have a monopoly on either decision.
One of the reasons a person may find that the majority of Christians they encounter are negative is because the negative ones are the ones most likely to get in your face and use their faith as a bludgeoning tool. The loving ones tend to carry theirs in their hearts and do their preaching with their arms and legs by giving their time to charitable works.
In the end, the labels are nothing and the actions are everything.
“In the end, the labels are nothing and the actions are everything.”
That sums it up perfectly for me, after all “actions speak louder than words” is a cliche because it’s true. It’s the real person behind the label that is important.
Back to your original blog, the world in my experience is rarely black and white, and I like to think of it as more than shades of grey – it is a vast spectrum of glorious colour! Where would we be without the curiosity and questioning that allows us to discover this and grow?
You’re right. Shades of grey would be rather drab.